What action must a journalist take upon receiving information indicating misconduct?

The most appropriate action for a journalist upon receiving information indicating misconduct is to approach the alleged wrongdoer for their side of the story. This practice aligns with the fundamental ethical principles of journalism, which emphasize fairness, accuracy, and accountability. By seeking the perspective of the alleged individual, the journalist ensures that the reporting will be balanced and comprehensive. This process also allows the accused party a chance to respond to the allegations, which is crucial for responsible reporting.

Additionally, this approach can help in verifying the information received and may lead to a more nuanced understanding of the situation. It reflects the commitment to the 'right of reply,' a core tenet in media ethics, ensuring that all involved parties are heard before any conclusions are drawn or stories are published.

In contrast, ignoring the information, publishing it immediately without verification, or solely reporting it to the authorities would not adhere to journalistic standards and could result in misinformation or bias, thereby undermining the integrity of the news.