What factor is NOT considered by a court when determining if privacy was infringed?

In privacy law, courts primarily focus on whether an individual has a reasonable expectation of privacy and whether the interference with that privacy is justified by public interest considerations. The concept of reasonable expectation of privacy is a key factor because it helps to establish the boundaries of what individuals can expect regarding their private lives being kept confidential.

Location plays a significant role because certain places, like one's home, generally have higher privacy expectations compared to public areas. Additionally, the relevance of the material to the public interest can influence court decisions, as information that serves a public benefit may sometimes override personal privacy concerns.

While the age of the claimant can influence various legal considerations, it is not a direct factor in assessing whether privacy has been infringed. Thus, it does not bear on the legal analysis required to determine the infringement of privacy rights in the context of the court's considerations.