What is the best practice to avoid mistaken identity in reporting court cases?

Publishing all legally-viable information from the court about the defendant is the best practice for avoiding mistaken identity in reporting court cases because it ensures that the information shared is accurate, comprehensive, and grounded in official records. This approach helps provide context and clarity regarding the defendant's identity, allowing the public to understand who the individual is without causing confusion with others who may share a similar name. By relying on information that is legally permissible for publication, journalists can adhere to ethical standards while minimizing the risk of identity errors.

In contrast, using pseudonyms for all defendants could create ambiguity, as it may lead to confusion about the identity of the individual involved in the case. Mentioning the defendant's name only once might not provide enough clarity or context for readers. Omitting identifying details completely can lead to a lack of understanding about the case, leaving the audience with insufficient information. Therefore, ensuring the accuracy and legality of the information provided is essential for responsible reporting.