What must online providers do to avoid contempt?

To avoid contempt, online providers need to be cautious about how they present information that could interfere with the legal process, especially in cases that are active or sub judice. Taking down sidebars that point to older stories is important because these links can inadvertently direct the audience to potentially prejudicial information related to ongoing legal proceedings. By removing such links, online providers minimize the risk of influencing public opinion or juror perspectives, which is crucial in maintaining the integrity of the judicial process.

The other choices do not specifically address the key requirement of avoiding the dissemination of information that could be contemptuous in nature. For example, updating stories frequently may not eliminate the risk associated with previously published content. Keeping all previous content visible can expose the public and jurors to information that is related to ongoing cases or may bias their views. Ensuring non-prejudicial information is accessible may seem beneficial, but it does not directly prevent the dissemination of potentially harmful content. Thus, the action of removing sidebars is the most effective and straightforward method to mitigate contempt risks.