Which defense is particularly useful in the context of live broadcasts?

The innocent dissemination defense is particularly suitable for the context of live broadcasts because it provides protection for individuals and organizations that are distributing information without knowledge of its potential defamatory nature. In live broadcasting, the fast-paced environment and the immediacy of the content can lead to unintentional dissemination of harmful statements.

This defense asserts that the broadcaster, or the distributor, had no reason to believe that the information was defamatory and that they took reasonable steps to avoid publishing such content. Therefore, if a defamatory statement is made during a live broadcast, the broadcaster may rely on this defense to argue that they should not be held liable since they did not have the intent or knowledge to harm someone's reputation.

The other defenses mentioned in the choices involve different scenarios or standards of expectation. For instance, the qualified privilege defense deals with circumstances where the speaker has a legal or moral duty to share information, while the truth defense requires proving the information published is accurate. The fair comment defense is pertinent when expressing opinions, but it does not apply to cases where false statements of fact are involved. Thus, in the context of live broadcasts, where the rapid nature of reporting can lead to inadvertent mistakes, the innocent dissemination defense is particularly relevant and useful.