Which is NOT a remedy for breach of privacy?

The option that is not considered a remedy for breach of privacy is a public apology. While public apologies can serve as a means of addressing wrongdoing in various contexts, they do not directly compensate the individual whose privacy has been breached, nor do they provide a legal remedy that prevents further breaches.

In the context of privacy law, remedies are typically actions that seek to restore the injured party or prevent further harm. For instance, damages are awarded to financial compensation for loss suffered due to the breach. Injunctions 'contra mundum' are legal orders preventing the breach from occurring, while super-injunctions serve to prevent the publication of identifying information about the parties involved, ensuring their privacy is protected. In contrast, a public apology does not inherently provide the same legal protections or compensatory effects that the other remedies offer.