Which of the following is NOT a remedy for copyright infringement?

The correct choice is that a public tribute is not considered a remedy for copyright infringement. Remedies for copyright infringement are typically aimed at providing justice to the copyright holder and may involve various forms of relief or compensation to address the harm caused by infringement.

Injunctions can be issued to prevent the infringer from continuing to infringe on the copyright, thereby serving as a proactive remedy. Financial compensation is a common remedy where the infringer may be required to pay for damages caused by their unauthorized use of the copyrighted material, which compensates the copyright holder for their losses. Seizure of infringing works enables authorities to remove unauthorized copies from circulation, thus protecting the rights of the copyright holder and preventing further infringement.

In contrast, a public tribute does not directly address the legal or financial ramifications of copyright infringement and thus does not serve as a legal remedy within the framework of copyright law. Instead, it may be more aligned with personal acknowledgment or appreciation, but it fails to provide the necessary legal recourse that the other remedies offer.